![]() Everything in Awesome is so sterile, so rigid and unwelcoming to me. With WM’s like OpenBox you get a blank screen, you can add your own panel and if you right click you get an applications menu. One thing that I got from Awesome Window Manager was that it was very rigid. It wasn’t that it was bad, it was just that I really wasn’t a fan of how it ended up working. You simply mark all your applications for use in different tags, and when you want to access them, you just click on a tag. Tagging sounds like a great idea on paper. I don’t know what was wrong with the workspace concept, because I was pretty sure that everyone was in agreement that it was an efficient way of doing things. I really just hated it to be frank.Īnother thing that really irritated me was ‘tagging’. If I have a pidgin message window open I don’t expect a rectangle of the screen to be taken up by it. ![]() For starters, I couldn’t use it for my day to day tasks because the window decorations were non existent. I usually like most window managers on Linux, but Awesome really just left a bad taste in my mouth. ![]() I really don’t understand why anyone would want to use it. I really just did not enjoy almost anything about it. I found it incredibly irritating and a pain to use. Honestly, I can’t say that I enjoyed using Awesome Window Manager. Awesome Window Manager is interesting to say the least. There’s a ton of different window managers for Linux but certainly not many like Awesome. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |